Author: Smoke Shop Locator

  • Gen Z Sparks Boom in Oral Nicotine Pouch Use Across Great Britain

    More than 500,000 people in Great Britain now use nicotine pouches, with the rise driven largely by Gen Z, new research shows.

    Nicotine pouches—small sachets placed between lip and gum to release nicotine—come in many flavours. Health experts warn they should not be used by anyone who does not already smoke; the products are banned in Germany and the Netherlands.

    Use among people aged 16 and over in England, Scotland and Wales climbed from 0.1% in 2020 to 1% in 2025, equivalent to about 522,000 people. The sharpest increase was among young people, according to figures published in Lancet Public Health.

    Researchers at UCL analysed data from the Smoking Toolkit study, covering almost 130,000 people aged 16 and over. They found a marked rise in prevalence, especially among Gen Z: 0.7% of 16- to 24-year-olds used pouches in 2022, rising to 4% in 2025. By contrast, use among those aged 35 and over showed “no meaningful change” over the same period. The research was funded by Cancer Research UK.

    Use was higher among men—particularly men aged 16 to 24—and among people who smoked or vaped. More than two-thirds of pouch users also used other nicotine products, while 16% had never smoked regularly. The proportion of smokers who used pouches during their most recent quit attempt rose from 2.6% in 2020 to 6.5% in 2025.

    Writing in Lancet Public Health, the authors said: “Nicotine pouch use has risen in Great Britain, primarily driven by sharp increases among young people, especially young men. Most users also smoked or vaped, and a growing proportion of smokers used pouches in attempts to quit smoking. These findings underscore the importance of implementing age-of-sale legislation for nicotine pouches and conducting research on their effectiveness for smoking cessation.”

    Lead author Dr Harry Tattan-Birch, of UCL’s Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, said the rise was “driven almost exclusively by young people, especially young men, while use among adults over 35 remained stable and low.” He suggested aggressive advertising on social media, billboards, in bars and train stations, and sponsorships of motorsports and music festivals may be targeting this group.

    Dr Tattan-Birch added that pouches pose “a substantially lower risk to health than cigarettes and are likely less harmful than e-cigarettes,” but cautioned they “are not harmless” and currently can be sold to children with no marketing restrictions and no cap on nicotine content. He called the findings evidence for the urgency of the tobacco and vapes bill, which would ban sales to under-18s, restrict advertising and give powers to regulate flavours, packaging and nicotine levels. “Proportionate measures are important to limit uptake among teenagers,” he said.

    Caroline Cerny, deputy chief executive of Ash, said the rise reflected “heavy and indiscriminate” marketing. “Over the past year, adverts have been plastered over buses, trains, and social media with giveaways at events popular with young people such as music festivals and shopping centres,” she said. “While they are likely to be less harmful than cigarettes, they shouldn’t be used by children or people who don’t already smoke, due to the addictive nature of nicotine.”


    This article was adapted from an original report published on theguardian.com. All rights belong to the original publisher.

  • Roanoke moves to curb vape shops with proposed ordinance

    ROANOKE, Va. — The City of Roanoke is weighing zoning changes aimed at curbing the rapid growth of vape shops across the city. Planning staff are evaluating an ordinance that would sharply limit where new vape retailers can open.

    “They’re everywhere, I feel like they’re invading. Any time you see a vacant storefront, a vacant building, think about Williamson Road, you drive by there a week or two weeks later, and you see a vape store, or you see the windows are covered up, and all you see is a flashing orange sign,” said Roanoke City Council Member Phazhon Nash.

    Since his election in November, Nash has pushed to stop more vape shops from arriving, citing stories he heard on the campaign trail from parents, teachers and addiction-prevention groups about how easily young people obtain these products.

    “Teachers who have desk drawers filled to the brim with vapes, Juuls, with all types of crazy things. Parents who are finding Kratom pills in their kids’ backpacks and all these substances are super super addictive and dangerous,” Nash said.

    Nash also says many local vape shops fail to properly ID customers and some hemp and vape stores do not follow state rules about what they may sell. “They’re selling products that are 100% addictive, dangerous, and most of the time they’re not properly regulated or FDA authorized,” he said.

    In August, Nash proposed charging vape shops a $20,000 annual operational fee, but the city has since shifted toward using zoning restrictions instead. The draft ordinance would bar new vape shops from opening within 1,000 feet of a school, church or park and within 2,000 feet of another vape shop. Roanoke County adopted a similar policy last year.

    “It’s just a way to really crack down on, in my opinion, a pretty predatory business that sets its sights on particular areas of our city where there are particular people or groups of people,” Nash said.

    The proposal would also prohibit new vape shops in the city’s enterprise and opportunity zones, areas designated for business development. “We want to make sure that those areas are being filled with productive businesses that add to the quality of life. That add perhaps entertainment to the lives of our youth, family activities, restaurants, shopping options, things of that nature, and not just a vape store,” Nash said.

    City officials plan to step up enforcement of rules limiting how much storefront windows can be covered. Nash acknowledged the changes won’t end youth vaping but said reducing the concentration of shops would help. “That’s not to say that this is going to be the end-all all be-all to the selling of these products to minors, it’s not. But there’s a difference when there are five of them within a few block radius versus one of them or two of them,” he said.

    Downtown residents interviewed by WDBJ7 on Tuesday largely supported limits on vape shops. “I mean, it’s probably as addictive as cigarettes are, and I would not want my children or my grandchildren to vape. I don’t think any of us would; we all discourage it,” said Roanoke resident Kendra Savage.

    Existing vape shops would be grandfathered in and not affected by the potential changes. Planning staff are drafting and evaluating the ordinance to ensure it is legally sound. The city intends to collect public input over the next few months and hopes to send the proposal to City Council for adoption in April.

    Copyright 2025 WDBJ. All rights reserved.

  • Study finds young adults commonly mix cannabis with nicotine and tobacco

    This article has been reviewed according to Science X’s editorial process and policies. Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content’s credibility:

    Credit: Pixabay/CC0 Public Domain

    A new Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health study finds that using cannabis together with nicotine and tobacco products is common—especially among people who vape. The research also shows both vaped and smoked cannabis have increased over time, with more people starting use than quitting.

    Until now, how often and why young adults use cannabis, and the specific ways they use it, has received limited attention. The findings appear in Tobacco Induced Diseases.

    Researchers found that young adults in the New York City area—including those who don’t use nicotine—reported using multiple cannabis forms such as vapes, edibles, and topicals. Cannabis is the third most commonly used drug worldwide; in 2023 an estimated 61.8 million people—about 22% of Americans ages 12 and older—said they had used marijuana at least once in the past year.

    “Cannabis use in the U.S. represents a multifaceted and evolving public health challenge that has, for too long, been overlooked,” said Katlyn McGraw, Ph.D., postdoctoral research scientist of Environmental Health Sciences at Columbia Mailman School.

    “We aimed to better understand use patterns and potential exposure to cannabis-related contaminants and associated health effects. Our findings show that cannabis use is diverse, complex, and growing —underscoring the need for further investigation.”

    To track trends and product types, the team analyzed data from the VapeScan longitudinal study, set up to evaluate subclinical health effects of e-cigarette use. The cohort included 372 adults, ages 18–50, in the New York City region, assessed between 2021 and 2024 regardless of cannabis use.

    Participants were seen at three points: baseline (visit 1), about 12 months later (visit 2), and about 24 months later (visit 3). At visit 1 participants answered questions about cannabis use; a more detailed questionnaire at visit 2 captured longitudinal trends and specific consumption methods. Participants were grouped as exclusive cannabis users, exclusive e-cigarette users, non–substance users, or dual users—those reporting daily or some-day use of both e-cigarettes and cigarettes.

    At visit 1:
    – 34% reported dual substance use
    – 4% reported exclusive cannabis use
    – 35% reported e-cigarette use without cannabis
    – 28% reported no substance use

    By visit 2, 59% of participants reported cannabis use:
    – 29% vaped cannabis
    – 28% smoked cannabis
    – 51% consumed edibles
    – 32% used CBD products
    – 4% used topical cannabis

    Frequency and intensity varied by product type. Importantly, self-reported vaped or smoked cannabis use shifted between visits: 21% of participants were new users at visit 2, while only 6% of those who vaped or smoked at visit 1 had quit. Rates of combined cannabis and e-cigarette use were similar for men and women.

    “Frequent cannabis use is becoming more widespread and will likely continue to rise with changing social norms, policy liberalization, and the increasing availability and promotion of cannabis products,” McGraw noted.

    “The prevalence of cannabis use among teens and young adults is increasing, as is the variety of products—edibles, concentrates, vapes—adding to the complexity of studying health effects.

    “As the third most widely used drug globally, understanding the health implications of cannabis is essential,” says Ana Navas-Acien, MD, Ph.D., Columbia Mailman School Leon Hess Professor and Chair, Environmental Health Sciences.

    “Our study highlights the importance of assessing cannabis exposure, including potential contaminants, and underscores that cannabis use is multifaceted. Regulatory policies and shifting consumer preferences further complicate efforts to accurately characterize exposure. Strengthening public health education that informs young adults about the compounded risks of cannabis–nicotine co-use is a first step.”

    More information: Cannabis Products and Trends in a Cohort of Young Adults: The Longitudinal VapeScan Study, Tobacco Induced Diseases (2025).


    This article was adapted from an original report published on medicalxpress.com. All rights belong to the original publisher.

  • Frisco Advances Smoke Shop Regulations — What It Means for Residents and Businesses

    Smoke shop regulations advance in Frisco

    Proposed rules would bar construction of new smoke shops within 1,000 feet of a school, place of worship or residential area. (Community Impact staff)


    This article was adapted from an original report published on communityimpact.com. All rights belong to the original publisher.

  • Lubbock Man Admits Guilt in Smoke Shop Shooting

    A Lubbock man has pleaded guilty in a shooting at a local smoke shop, KLBK reports.


    This article was adapted from an original report published on everythinglubbock.com. All rights belong to the original publisher.

  • “I Don’t Know How We’ll Stay Open”: Virginia Vape Shop Owner Sounds the Alarm Over New Ban

    Title: December 31, 2025 deadline could close hundreds of Virginia vape shops — and shift who profits from regulation

    On December 31, most vape products currently sold in Virginia will be illegal to sell.

    A law passed by the Virginia General Assembly and signed by Gov. Glenn Youngkin requires retailers to stock only nicotine and vape products listed on a state-maintained directory. In practice, that list will be limited to a small set of products tied to federal authorization, effectively banning the vast majority of flavored and disposable vapes from retail shelves across the state.

    For shop owners like Tony Aziz, who runs Native Smoke in Richmond, the consequences are immediate and existential.

    “If this goes into effect the way it’s written,” Aziz said, “I don’t know how we stay open.”

    The fallout is not theoretical: broken leases, layoffs and the likely closure of hundreds of small businesses across Virginia. State records list more than 1,300 registered hemp and vape retailers statewide, and industry sources say the true number is likely higher because many nicotine-only or mixed retailers aren’t registered. Many of these stores sit in working-class corridors and strip centers already struggling to stay filled, raising questions about who will absorb the economic shock when enforcement hits overnight.

    Who gets to stay on the shelf

    The universe of vape products that will remain legal in Virginia is remarkably small. According to the FDA’s list of authorized e-cigarettes, nearly all approved products belong to major tobacco companies — including JUUL, Vuse, NJOY and Logic. Independent disposable brands and the flavored products that dominate most vape-shop shelves are almost entirely absent.

    In July 2025, JUUL, owned by Richmond-based Altria, received FDA marketing authorization for its tobacco and menthol pods, allowing those products to remain available nationwide. That approval puts JUUL and its corporate partners in a privileged position just as Virginia prepares to eliminate most competing products from retail shelves.

    The change won’t eliminate vaping; it will narrow who profits from it. Regulation, in this case, is consolidating the market.

    A familiar framework

    This pattern isn’t limited to nicotine. Virginia’s adult-use cannabis market, scheduled to begin in November 2026, is being built around limited licenses, high capital requirements and heavy compliance obligations — a framework that critics say favors well-capitalized corporate operators over small businesses and undercuts equity goals. (Read our Virginia Cannabis Marketplace framework coverage; photo by R. Anthony Harris.)

    Enforcement against vape and hemp-derived products is also accelerating. For many vape shops, CBD and other hemp-derived cannabinoid products aren’t a side business — they’re essential to staying open. As those items are swept up in enforcement actions, independent retailers are being pushed out entirely.

    The effect is sequential: vape and hemp retailers disappear first. By the time legal cannabis arrives, the network of small, decentralized cannabinoid storefronts may already be gone. What remains are businesses built to withstand regulatory narrowing — big tobacco companies with FDA-authorized products, multi-state cannabis operators able to absorb licensing costs, and corporate retail chains with statewide infrastructure and political power. The outcome looks less like prohibition and more like consolidation across adjacent markets.

    “He did everything the right way”

    Aziz’s stakes are shaped by a life built around hard work and little margin for failure. A refugee from Iraq, he spent years supporting family members stuck elsewhere in the region while carving out a life in the U.S. He slept in the subway in New York at one point and took whatever work he could find — washing dishes, delivering food — until he saved enough to move to Richmond, learn the business, and eventually open his own shop after nearly a decade working for someone else.

    “I didn’t just wake up and open a business,” he said. “I worked for years. Everything I had went into this.” He put his name on a lease, built a household, put family on payroll — and now faces the prospect that those years of stability could vanish.

    “This store is my life,” he said. “I worked too hard to get here to just walk away.”

    Why enforcement lands at the counter

    Under Virginia law, legality can change depending on where a product sits in the supply chain. Many vape and hemp-derived products are not illegal to manufacture, warehouse or distribute in Virginia; they become illegal only at the point of retail sale if they’re not listed on the state’s approved product directory. That distinction places enforcement squarely on the retailer, not the distributor or manufacturer.

    Aziz says that divide drives confusion and frustration. “I’m buying from a warehouse in Virginia,” he said. “They sell it legally. But I get the ticket.” When he pressed regulators, he said the answer was blunt: “You are direct to consumer. The warehouse is not.”

    The rules, he adds, change frequently, sometimes without clear notice. “Delta-8 was legal. Then it wasn’t. Delta-10 was legal. Then they took that too.” Each change forced him to adjust inventory and suppliers. Inspections offered little clarity, he said: regulators would inspect and raise no concerns, then months later fines would arrive for the same products.

    One memorable citation involved a CBD product that contained no THC, Aziz said. The initial penalty was $50,000; after appeals it was reduced to $1,000. What stayed with him was the message he received: “It’s not their responsibility to keep us informed. It’s our responsibility to know.”

    That experience, he says, exposes an imbalance: manufacturers and distributors operate with legal teams and compliance staff and can move inventory across states. Retailers cannot. “The enforcement always comes to the store,” Aziz said. “Not the manufacturer. Not the warehouse. You’re the last stop. So everything lands on you.”

    “Most people just want to stay quiet”

    Aziz is aware of a legal challenge to Virginia’s vape restrictions; a handful of distributors and retailers have sued, arguing the law is a de facto ban that advantages large manufacturers. But he doesn’t expect most shop owners to join that fight.

    “That lawsuit is not coming from the average store,” he said. “It’s coming from people who can afford lawyers. That’s not most of us.”

    Virginia’s retail vape industry is overwhelmingly immigrant-owned, Aziz estimates — 90 to 95 percent — many first-generation entrepreneurs. For them, the calculus is personal: thin margins, family on payroll, long-term leases. Any disruption has immediate ripple effects.

    “People think if you’re legal, you shouldn’t be scared,” Aziz said. “That’s not how it works.” Fighting the state feels risky: “They don’t want to be on a list. They don’t want inspections every week. They don’t want somebody asking extra questions.”

    He is cautious discussing race. “I don’t want to say it’s racist,” he said. “But sometimes it feels like they know who to go after.” His concern is structural: enforcement targets the storefront, not upstream actors. In the current climate, he said, many simply don’t want problems with the government. “Most of us came here to work, not to fight,” he said. “We followed the rules. We opened stores. We paid taxes. We did everything the right way.”

    What happens when no one pushes back

    When resistance is limited, regulation becomes the outcome. On December 31, Virginia will remove the product diversity that sustains most independent vape shops. Once the Attorney General publishes the state’s approved product directory, retailers will have 60 days to sell through or remove any inventory not on that list. After that window, those products cannot legally be sold.

    For many shops, that inventory is their core business. The law doesn’t mandate closures, but by restricting legal sales to a narrow set of authorized products it can remove the economic foundation that makes staying open viable. By the time legal cannabis arrives in 2026, many small, immigrant-owned retailers that once served nicotine and hemp demand may already be gone — not by outright ban, but by attrition. The outcome will be described as regulation, but its effects may resemble monopoly.

    Support independent local coverage

    At a time when media ownership is increasingly concentrated, RVA Magazine remains one of Richmond’s independent voices, covering artists, musicians and communities since 2005. If you value local, grassroots reporting free from outside interference, consider supporting RVA Magazine with a small donation — even $2 helps. Your contribution keeps independent coverage alive.

  • South Korea to Reclassify All Nicotine Products as ‘Cigarettes’ — Major Regulatory Shake-Up

    South Korea’s Cabinet has moved to close regulatory and tax loopholes around liquid e-cigarettes — including those that use synthetic nicotine or other nicotine substitutes — citing growing safety concerns.

    At a Cabinet meeting on December 16 chaired by President Lee Jae-myung, the government approved amendments to the Tobacco Business Act that legally classify liquid e-cigarettes as tobacco products. The revised law expands the definition of cigarettes from products made from tobacco leaves to any product containing tobacco or nicotine, bringing synthetic-nicotine liquids under formal regulation.

    President Lee warned that nicotine substitutes have been circulated without sufficient safety verification and called for stronger institutional oversight. Officials also raised reports of suspected lung damage linked to liquid e-cigarette use.

    Deputy Prime Minister and Finance Minister Koo Yoon-cheol said products released four months after the law takes effect will be regulated and taxed as cigarettes. He cautioned, however, that the government’s regulatory reach is limited for so-called “nicotine-free” products produced before the law’s implementation, and that those items will require separate management and hazard assessments.

    The revision is intended to eliminate regulatory and taxation blind spots and to gradually strengthen safety management for nicotine substitutes.


    This article was adapted from an original report published on tobaccoreporter.com. All rights belong to the original publisher.

  • Malaysia Announces 2026 Vape Ban — What Vapers Need to Know

    Malaysia moves toward nationwide vaping ban, Health Ministry targets end of 2026

    Malaysia is heading for a nationwide ban on vaping, Health Minister Datuk Seri Dr. Dzulkefly Ahmad said, with the Health Ministry aiming to finalize and implement the policy by the end of 2026. He added that the Cabinet has already agreed in principle to ban vape products, stressing the issue is no longer whether vaping will be banned, but when. The ministry plans to bring the matter back to Cabinet early next year to complete the regulatory and legislative processes.

    Dzulkefly cited rising public health concerns, particularly cases of drug-induced psychosis linked to adulterated vape liquids and synthetic substances. Those cases are being monitored by a special Health Ministry task group working with medical experts.


    This article was adapted from an original report published on tobaccoreporter.com. All rights belong to the original publisher.

  • “I Don’t Know How We’ll Stay Open”: Virginia Vape Shop Owner Says New Law Threatens His Business

    Title: A December 31, 2025 deadline could shutter hundreds of vape shops, raising questions about consolidation, equity, and who benefits from regulation

    On December 31, 2025, most vape products currently sold in Virginia will become illegal to sell.

    A law passed by the General Assembly and signed by Gov. Glenn Youngkin allows only nicotine and vape products listed on a state-maintained directory to be sold. In practice, that directory will contain a very small set of items tied to federal authorization, effectively banning the vast majority of flavored and disposable vapes from retail shelves across the state.

    For shop owners like Tony Aziz, who runs Native Smoke in Richmond, the change is existential. “If this goes into effect the way it’s written,” Aziz said, “I don’t know how we stay open.”

    The immediate fallout isn’t hypothetical: broken leases, layoffs, and the shuttering of hundreds of small businesses statewide. State records list more than 1,300 registered hemp and vape retailers, and industry sources say the true total is likely higher because many nicotine-only or mixed retail locations aren’t registered. Many of these shops are clustered in working-class corridors and strip centers that already struggle to stay filled, magnifying who bears the economic shock when enforcement pivots overnight.

    Who gets to stay on the shelf

    The set of vape products that will remain legal in Virginia is strikingly small. The FDA’s list of authorized e-cigarettes is dominated by major tobacco companies — JUUL, Vuse, NJOY, and Logic. Independent disposable brands and the flavored products that fill most vape shop shelves are largely absent.

    In July 2025, JUUL received FDA marketing authorization for its on-market system, allowing its tobacco and menthol pods to remain on the market nationwide. That decision places JUUL, and its corporate partners, in a privileged position just as Virginia prepares to remove most competing products from retail. The result isn’t the disappearance of nicotine use; it’s the narrowing of who can sell it.

    A familiar framework

    The pattern repeats beyond nicotine. Virginia plans to launch a tightly regulated adult-use cannabis market in November 2026 with limited licenses, high capital requirements, and heavy compliance obligations. That framework has already prompted debate over whether equity goals are undercut by barriers favoring large, well-capitalized operators.

    Meanwhile, enforcement against vape and hemp-derived products has accelerated. For many vape shops, CBD and other hemp-derived cannabinoid products aren’t side hustles — they’re core revenue. As those products are swept up by enforcement, independent retailers are being pushed out entirely.

    The effect is sequential: first, vape and hemp retailers disappear; then, when legal cannabis arrives, the existing network of small, decentralized cannabinoid storefronts is gone. What remains are businesses built to survive regulatory narrowing — Big Tobacco with FDA-authorized nicotine products, multi-state cannabis operators able to absorb licensing costs, alcohol distributors and corporate chains with statewide infrastructure and political leverage. Regulation doesn’t stop consumption; it decides who is allowed to sell.

    “He did everything the right way”

    Aziz’s stakes are more than financial. He came to the U.S. as a refugee from war-torn Iraq, endured years of instability, and worked a string of low-wage jobs before building a life in Richmond. He spent nine years learning the business for another shop owner, saved every dollar, and eventually opened Native Smoke. He put his name on a lease, married, bought a house, and employed family members. “This is not just a business. This is how your whole family survives,” he said.

    “I love America,” Aziz said. “I really do. I think it’s the greatest country on earth.” But that belief makes the current moment harder to reconcile. “We did everything legal,” he said. “We followed every rule they gave us.” Now, as the rules change again, he feels the ground shift beneath him. “This store is my life. I worked too hard to get here to just walk away.”

    Why enforcement lands at the counter

    Virginia’s law treats legality differently depending on where a product sits in the supply chain. Many vape and hemp-derived products can be manufactured, warehoused, or distributed legally inside Virginia, but become illegal at retail if they’re not on the state’s approved product directory. That structure puts enforcement squarely on the retailer, not the distributor or manufacturer.

    Aziz says that divide is central to the confusion and frustration. “I’m buying from a warehouse in Virginia,” he said. “They sell it legally. But I get the ticket.” When he asked regulators for clarity, he was told, “You are direct to consumer. The warehouse is not.”

    Rules have shifted rapidly, he said — delta-8 legal, then not; delta-10 legal, then not — and each change forced him to adjust inventory and suppliers. Inspections offered little certainty: regulators could inspect without citing problems, only for fines to arrive months later for items previously reviewed. Native Smoke was cited for selling a CBD product that contained no THC — not because of its contents, Aziz says, but over labeling and approval requirements he says were never clearly communicated. The initial penalty was $50,000; after escalation it was reduced to $1,000. “They told me it’s not their responsibility to keep us informed,” he said. “It’s our responsibility to know.”

    That response, he says, highlights an imbalance: manufacturers and distributors often have legal teams and compliance staff and can move inventory across state lines. Retailers do not. “The enforcement always comes to the store,” Aziz said. “Not the manufacturer. Not the warehouse.” In practice, legal movement upstream can leave responsibility and risk concentrated at the retail level. “You’re the last stop,” he said. “So everything lands on you.”

    “Most people just want to stay quiet”

    Aziz is aware of a legal challenge to Virginia’s vape restrictions. A handful of distributors and retailers have sued, arguing the law functions as a de facto ban and unfairly advantages large manufacturers. But he doesn’t expect most shop owners to join that fight.

    “That lawsuit is not coming from the average store,” he said. “It’s coming from people who can afford lawyers. That’s not most of us.” He estimates 90 to 95 percent of Virginia’s vape shops are immigrant-owned, many first-generation business owners. For them, the calculus is personal: thin margins, family on payroll, long-term leases. Disruption can ripple immediately. “People think if you’re legal, you shouldn’t be scared,” Aziz said. “That’s not how it works.”

    Many owners fear drawing attention. “They don’t want to be on a list,” he said. “They don’t want inspections every week. They don’t want somebody asking extra questions.” Aziz is careful about invoking race — “I don’t want to say it’s racist,” he said — but he worries enforcement targets those who are most vulnerable. “They don’t go after the warehouse. They don’t go after the manufacturer. They come to the store.”

    In the current political climate, reluctance to push back is stronger. “Right now, people don’t want problems with the government,” he said. “Any government.” Even owners with legal status hesitate. “Most of us came here to work, not to fight,” he said. “We followed the rules. We opened stores. We paid taxes. We did everything the right way.”

    What happens when no one pushes back

    Absent broad resistance, regulation becomes outcome. Markets consolidate.

    On December 31, Virginia will remove the product diversity that sustains most independent vape shops. Once the Attorney General publishes the state’s approved product directory, retailers will have 60 days to sell through or remove inventory not on that list. After that, those products cannot legally be sold.

    The law does not force stores to close, but by restricting legal sales to a narrow set of authorized products, it removes the economic foundation that makes staying open viable for many. By the time Virginia’s adult-use cannabis market opens in 2026, many small, immigrant-owned retailers that once served nicotine and hemp demand may already be gone — not by prohibition, but by attrition. That outcome will be described as regulation, but its effects may look a lot like monopoly.

    Support RVA Magazine

    RVA Magazine is one of Richmond’s independent voices, documenting local artists, musicians, and communities since 2005. Independent coverage requires resources; small donations, even $2, help keep that reporting alive and free from outside interference. If you value local journalism, consider supporting the magazine.

  • Police Probe Reported Robbery at Eldred Vape Shop

    Help Our Community

    Please support local businesses by completing an online survey to help us navigate these unprecedented times. Responses will not be shared or used for any purpose other than to better serve our community.

    Take the survey at www.pulsepoll.com. A $1,000 prize will be awarded — everyone who completes the survey may enter the contest to win as our way of saying “Thank you” for your time.

    Take the Survey