Author: Smoke Shop Locator

  • Tobacco Outlets Encircle Bangladesh Schools — Putting Children at Risk

    A new study by the Power and Participation Research Centre, reported in New Age, found that cigarettes are highly accessible to young people: on average, 5.5 tobacco-selling outlets are located within 100 meters of each school in Bangladesh. The research surveyed 121 schools across Dhaka, Chattogram, Rajshahi, and Khulna and identified 666 points of sale, with most vendors selling single cigarette sticks.

    The study revealed several worrying practices: 71% of outlets openly displayed cigarettes—often placed at children’s eye level—while 66% stocked tobacco products alongside chocolates, toys, and sweets. It also found that 68% of retail points used visible advertising such as dummy packs and posters, and 84% sold flavored cigarettes.


    This article was adapted from an original report published on tobaccoreporter.com. All rights belong to the original publisher.

  • Smoke shop slapped with nearly $13 million fine under Wisconsin’s tough new vape law

    Wisconsin smoke shop hit with nearly $13 million fine under new vape law — Milwaukee Journal Sentinel


    This article was adapted from an original report published on news.google.com. All rights belong to the original publisher.

  • Smoke-shop chain hit with nearly $13M fine under new Wisconsin vape law

    Dec. 10, 2025, 5:03 a.m. CT

    In the first three months after Wisconsin’s new vape law took effect, the Department of Revenue has issued more than $13 million in fines to two retailers, handed out 42 orders to remove illegal products at other stores and carried out 27 seizures of unauthorized vapes. Oral arguments over the 2023 law are set for Dec. 10, and a decision is expected in late January.

    The state fined one retailer nearly $13 million and another $450,000 for violating the law that began Sept. 1 and is now being challenged in appeals court.

    Exclusive Tobacco, a four-store chain with a location in Oshkosh, was hit with two fines in October for selling products not on the state’s approved list, which allows only certain brands such as Juul, Blu, Vuse and Crossbar.

    After receiving complaints, the Department of Revenue inspected the Oshkosh store and found it was selling vapes and tobacco products with an expired municipal license. Officials seized all products, including 1,244 illegal vapes. The law carries a $1,000 daily fine for each device not on the state directory, which amounted to $1,244,000.

    A copy of the fine reviewed by the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel shows that amount was multiplied by 10 — covering the 10 days between the department’s warning and the return to seize products — producing a bill of more than $12.4 million now owed by Exclusive Tobacco.

    The department later received another complaint that the Oshkosh location continued selling illegal vapes, prompting a second inspection and a separate fine of $431,000. Exclusive Tobacco is appealing both fines, DOR spokeswoman Jennifer Bacon told the Journal Sentinel.

    The DOR also fined a second retailer, Dave’z Smoke N Vape LLC in Green Bay, $450,000 for selling without a municipal license. Neither store responded to interview requests.

    Beyond those fines, the department issued 42 removal orders to other stores and conducted 27 seizures, two of which involved retailers operating without municipal licenses.

    When the law took effect, the DOR initially paused enforcement — no fines or seizures in the opening weeks — to give retailers time to comply. Bacon said the department is now following the enforcement procedures spelled out in the 2023 law.

    She added that the expired municipal licenses triggered the removal of all cigarettes, tobacco and vapes, but did not affect how fines were calculated. The penalties were based on sales of products that aren’t among the 303 items the state permits.

    Appeal underway as stores adapt or close

    Most vape shops have adapted, clearing now-illegal products from shelves and relying on other sales. Many remain hopeful, though, that a court could strike down the law and restore more products to inventory.

    In September, U.S. District Judge William Conley denied a request to block the law. The industry plaintiff, Wisconsinites for Alternatives to Smoking and Tobacco, appealed that decision. The 7th Circuit Court of Appeals in Chicago will hear oral arguments Dec. 10; a ruling is expected in late January, Tyler Hall, president of WiscoFAST and Johnny Vapes, told the Journal Sentinel.

    Similar lawsuits have produced mixed results elsewhere: a federal court blocked Iowa’s vape directory law in May, while Utah’s was upheld in March.

    Hall and other store owners say big tobacco companies lobbied for the law to squeeze competitors. Wisconsin lobbying records show such activity in 2023, and experts say the same pattern has occurred in other states. Public health advocates question whether the approach is effective, noting the law removed some products but left others accessible, including to teens. State officials defend the policy as a measured response to a rapidly growing industry while balancing public safety.

    Locally, several Milwaukee-area shop owners told the Journal Sentinel in October that most of their sales come from hemp-based products, so the vape law had limited impact on their businesses. Still, they worry that impending state regulations and a sudden federal change could ban those items as well.

    Others have not fared as well. George Packard, whose Antigo store relied on vapes for 90% of sales, closed after the district court allowed the law to take effect.

    “We had six employees, and every one of them lost his job,” Packard said. Even if the appeal succeeds, he doesn’t expect to reopen: the space will be rented out and his former employees will have moved on. “It took three days to tear that store apart. We’re sitting on probably $40,000 in merchandise that we can’t do anything with,” he told the Journal Sentinel in early October. “We can’t sell it, because it’s illegal.”

    Hope Karnopp can be reached at HKarnopp@gannett.com.


    This article was adapted from an original report published on jsonline.com. All rights belong to the original publisher.

  • 8 compelling reasons the New Zealand government should say no to oral nicotine pouches

    It is now clear the government has missed its smokefree target of fewer than 5% of people smoking across all population groups by the end of this year.

    The latest New Zealand Health Survey shows 6.8% of adults smoked daily this year — essentially unchanged from last year (6.9%) and 2022–23 (6.8%). Tobacco remains widely available, and stark inequities persist: 15% of Māori smoke daily.

    At the same time, vaping is widespread among young people. The survey estimates 13.6% of 15- to 17-year-olds now vape daily, up from 10.3% in 2024 — roughly 27,000 people below the legal age for vape sales who are now addicted.

    Tobacco and nicotine companies are pushing to introduce oral nicotine pouches, pitching them as a “cleaner way to enjoy nicotine.” But the flavours, packaging and marketing of these products appeal to young people, and approving them risks exposing more young people to nicotine addiction and worsening problems already caused by vaping.

    How pouches work
    Oral nicotine pouches are small sachets containing nicotine extracted from tobacco or made synthetically. Users tuck a pouch under their upper lip and absorb nicotine through the gums, getting a potent dose without inhaling smoke or vaping aerosol.

    In 2024, Associate Health Minister Casey Costello, following the National–NZ First coalition agreement, secured Cabinet’s approval in principle to introduce these products. That move raises several serious concerns.

    First, there is no evidence pouches help people quit. Ministry of Health officials advised that oral nicotine pouches are not supported as cessation aids. An expert group convened by the ministry recommended a moratorium on new nicotine products “until there is clear, independent evidence that [these] are safer than smoking and effective in helping people who smoke to stop smoking.” A recent systematic review reached the same conclusion: no evidence shows pouches help people stop using tobacco or vaping products or reduce smoking or vaping prevalence. Even tobacco companies do not market them as quit tools. As Philip Morris states: “Our smoke-free products […] are not designed as cessation aids.”

    Second, health risks are not yet known. Although pouches are not inhaled, they may affect oral, cardiovascular and mental health. A recent study noted tissue changes that could indicate increased risk of mouth cancers.

    Third, oral nicotine pouches are highly addictive. Nicotine alters brain development in adolescents and young adults, changing pathways tied to learning, attention and impulse control. Experts warn these products could entrench nicotine dependence among a large number of young people.

    Fourth, nicotine addiction carries lifelong financial, physical, social and emotional costs. Introducing a consumer product whose primary function is maintaining addiction is not progress for public health.

    Fifth, international evidence shows pouches are designed to attract young people. They come in sweet, fruity and alcoholic flavours, in eye-catching packaging that resembles chewing gum or mints, and are promoted by influencers as lifestyle enhancers that boost energy, concentration and social confidence. That is marketing for addiction, not cessation.

    We already struggle to help young people quit vaping. Approving another discreet, youth-friendly, addictive product would, in our view, be reckless.

    Why new nicotine products won’t solve the problem
    Sixth, pouches are virtually invisible in use: no smoke, no aerosol, no obvious smell. That makes them hard to detect and easy to conceal, including in schools.

    Seventh, the logic of introducing pouches to solve smoking or vaping is flawed. The government introduced vaping as a possible route to reduce smoking, and now proposes pouches as another supposed solution. Legalising more nicotine products is not a targeted way to reduce smoking, especially when uptake of novel products is highest among young adults — most of whom do not smoke.

    Most importantly, these products threaten the Tupeka Kore (tobacco-free) vision set out by Māori leaders. That goal seeks not only to reduce smoking but to eliminate addictive nicotine products and the disproportionate burden of nicotine addiction on Māori communities.

    The industry presents pouches as safer and empowering, but in reality they risk entrenching dependence and deepening inequities. Governments have a duty to protect the public — and especially young people — from being commercially targeted by manufacturers of highly addictive products.

    Before any new nicotine product is allowed, robust, independent evidence must show it will improve population health and reduce, not expand, nicotine addiction. That standard has not been met for oral nicotine pouches.


    This article was adapted from an original report published on theconversation.com. All rights belong to the original publisher.

  • Pre‑dawn Break-In Foiled: Hazleton Police Stop Smoke Shop Burglary

    Hazleton police thwart early-morning burglary at smoke shop


    This article was adapted from an original report published on news.google.com. All rights belong to the original publisher.

  • Greenville Deputies Team Up with SLED in Local Vape Shop Investigation

    GREENVILLE COUNTY, S.C. — The Greenville County Sheriff’s Office confirmed it is assisting the South Carolina Law Enforcement Division (SLED) with an investigation involving vape shops in the county.

    Officials say the investigation is ongoing.

    Stay with FOX Carolina as we continue to gather more information.

    Feel more informed, prepared, and connected with FOX Carolina. For more free content like this, download our apps.

    Copyright 2025 WHNS. All rights reserved.

  • Breaking: Agents Raid Florence Vape Shop, Sheriff Says

    Agents carried out a raid Tuesday morning on a vape business located on West Palmetto Street at the Florence Mall, Florence County Sheriff T.J. Joye said.

    Joye said the action was part of a special operation involving the State Law Enforcement Division (SLED), the Florence Police Department, the Florence County Sheriff’s Office and the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA).

    He added that more information will be released at a later time.

    READ NEXT: 1 in custody after Surfside Beach narcotics search in statewide investigation

  • Brazen Burglary at Local Vape Shop — KSAL News

    Police are reviewing surveillance footage after a smash-and-grab at a Salina vape shop.

    Police Lt. Andrew Zeigler told KSAL News that about 1 a.m. Tuesday two suspects wearing hoodies and sunglasses used a large rock to smash the front window of Juicy’s Vapor Lounge on Planet Avenue.

    Once inside, the suspects shattered two glass display cases and took a number of nicotine vapes and e-cigarettes. Estimated loss and damage range from $2,000 to $3,000.

  • Amherst and Leverett Pass ‘Nicotine‑Free Generation’ Policies — Pioneering Move to Curb Youth Nicotine Use

    AMHERST — Health officials in Amherst and Leverett have approved Nicotine-Free Generation policies that bar anyone who hasn’t already turned 21 by Jan. 1, 2026 from ever legally purchasing cigarettes, vapes or other tobacco products in those communities.

    In a 4-0 vote Thursday, the Amherst Board of Health amended its “Restricting the Sale of Tobacco and Nicotine Products” regulation to add the provision. The change takes effect Jan. 1, though enforcement won’t begin until July 1.

    Amherst’s action followed three days after the Leverett Board of Health passed its own Nicotine-Free Generation rule, which begins in the new year and is expected to be enforced starting Feb. 1.

    Though the Amherst vote was unanimous, some board members questioned whether the policy will meaningfully reduce tobacco use, even as the town has led other public health moves—raising the sale age to 21 before the state and banning smoking in bars, for example.

    Chair Risha Hess said the broader value lies in prompting other towns and the state to consider similar measures. “I think the most motivating aspect for myself is supporting other towns and trying to make this something the state takes a look at,” she said.

    Board member Betsy Brooks said she would vote reluctantly, expressing concern about declining trust in public health institutions amid growing skepticism on issues like vaccines. “I’m very concerned about backlash against overreach,” Brooks said.

    Where Leverett has tobacco available only at the Leverett Village Co-op, Amherst has 14 stores with tobacco licenses.

    The health board plans fines of $300, $600 and $1,000 for first, second and third violations, respectively. A second violation would trigger a seven-day license suspension and a third would bring a 30-day suspension.

    Board member Jack Jemsek warned the policy could fuel a black market, likening it to alcohol prohibition. “To me, it just seems like it’s feeding this black market,” he said. Still, he acknowledged the goal. “We’re trying to get healthy as a community and a nation,” Jemsek added.

    Hess also voiced concern that the rule could push buyers online, where regulation is currently weaker.

    Public comment on the regulation—both oral testimony at an October hearing and written feedback—has closed, but Peter Brennan, executive director of the New England Convenience Stores and Energy Marketers Association, criticized the process for limiting input after the in-person meeting. “I think it’s a foolish policy and I think that a city like Amherst that attracts so many young adults could get a bad reputation in the minds of those looking to go there for school if it’s seen as a hyperactive, nanny government that will not allow adults to purchase nicotine products,” Brennan said.


    This article was adapted from an original report published on recorder.com. All rights belong to the original publisher.

  • U.S. Momentum Propels BAT Toward FY25 Targets

    BAT today (9 December) released its 2025 full-year pre-close trading update, forecasting around 2% growth in both revenue and adjusted operating profit for FY25. The company said New Category revenues are expected to accelerate to double-digit growth in H2, delivering mid-single-digit growth for the full year.

    The U.S. is driving performance, where stronger combustibles results and momentum behind Velo Plus are boosting both revenue and profit. BAT said Velo Plus is on track to be profitable for the full year. Early federal and state enforcement action against illicit vapor products has also helped recent improvements in Vuse volumes and revenues.

    New Category growth is being driven primarily by Velo, which BAT describes as the “fastest-growing Modern Oral brand globally,” with strong share gains across priority markets and accelerating performance in the U.S. Glo revenue remains broadly flat amid competitive pressure and platform transitions, although the company is introducing glo Hilo in premium heated tobacco markets. Vuse is showing improving H2 trends—supported by enforcement against illicit products—and the premium Vuse Ultra platform is gaining early traction in Canada, Germany and France despite ongoing headwinds in the U.S. and Canada.

    Looking further ahead, BAT reiterated confidence in its mid-term targets from 2026: guiding 3–5% revenue growth, 4–6% adjusted operating profit growth and 5–8% EPS growth, with 2026 likely to sit at the lower end of those ranges. Cash generation remains strong, with operating cash flow conversion expected to exceed 95% and leverage targeted to fall to 2.0–2.5x by end-2026.

    Capital returns remain a priority. BAT confirmed progressive dividends and an expanded £1.3bn share buyback program for FY26.


    This article was adapted from an original report published on tobaccoreporter.com. All rights belong to the original publisher.