“I Don’t Know How We’ll Stay Open”: Virginia Vape Shop Owner Says New Law Threatens His Business

Title: A December 31, 2025 deadline could shutter hundreds of vape shops, raising questions about consolidation, equity, and who benefits from regulation

On December 31, 2025, most vape products currently sold in Virginia will become illegal to sell.

A law passed by the General Assembly and signed by Gov. Glenn Youngkin allows only nicotine and vape products listed on a state-maintained directory to be sold. In practice, that directory will contain a very small set of items tied to federal authorization, effectively banning the vast majority of flavored and disposable vapes from retail shelves across the state.

For shop owners like Tony Aziz, who runs Native Smoke in Richmond, the change is existential. “If this goes into effect the way it’s written,” Aziz said, “I don’t know how we stay open.”

The immediate fallout isn’t hypothetical: broken leases, layoffs, and the shuttering of hundreds of small businesses statewide. State records list more than 1,300 registered hemp and vape retailers, and industry sources say the true total is likely higher because many nicotine-only or mixed retail locations aren’t registered. Many of these shops are clustered in working-class corridors and strip centers that already struggle to stay filled, magnifying who bears the economic shock when enforcement pivots overnight.

Who gets to stay on the shelf

The set of vape products that will remain legal in Virginia is strikingly small. The FDA’s list of authorized e-cigarettes is dominated by major tobacco companies — JUUL, Vuse, NJOY, and Logic. Independent disposable brands and the flavored products that fill most vape shop shelves are largely absent.

In July 2025, JUUL received FDA marketing authorization for its on-market system, allowing its tobacco and menthol pods to remain on the market nationwide. That decision places JUUL, and its corporate partners, in a privileged position just as Virginia prepares to remove most competing products from retail. The result isn’t the disappearance of nicotine use; it’s the narrowing of who can sell it.

A familiar framework

The pattern repeats beyond nicotine. Virginia plans to launch a tightly regulated adult-use cannabis market in November 2026 with limited licenses, high capital requirements, and heavy compliance obligations. That framework has already prompted debate over whether equity goals are undercut by barriers favoring large, well-capitalized operators.

Meanwhile, enforcement against vape and hemp-derived products has accelerated. For many vape shops, CBD and other hemp-derived cannabinoid products aren’t side hustles — they’re core revenue. As those products are swept up by enforcement, independent retailers are being pushed out entirely.

The effect is sequential: first, vape and hemp retailers disappear; then, when legal cannabis arrives, the existing network of small, decentralized cannabinoid storefronts is gone. What remains are businesses built to survive regulatory narrowing — Big Tobacco with FDA-authorized nicotine products, multi-state cannabis operators able to absorb licensing costs, alcohol distributors and corporate chains with statewide infrastructure and political leverage. Regulation doesn’t stop consumption; it decides who is allowed to sell.

“He did everything the right way”

Aziz’s stakes are more than financial. He came to the U.S. as a refugee from war-torn Iraq, endured years of instability, and worked a string of low-wage jobs before building a life in Richmond. He spent nine years learning the business for another shop owner, saved every dollar, and eventually opened Native Smoke. He put his name on a lease, married, bought a house, and employed family members. “This is not just a business. This is how your whole family survives,” he said.

“I love America,” Aziz said. “I really do. I think it’s the greatest country on earth.” But that belief makes the current moment harder to reconcile. “We did everything legal,” he said. “We followed every rule they gave us.” Now, as the rules change again, he feels the ground shift beneath him. “This store is my life. I worked too hard to get here to just walk away.”

Why enforcement lands at the counter

Virginia’s law treats legality differently depending on where a product sits in the supply chain. Many vape and hemp-derived products can be manufactured, warehoused, or distributed legally inside Virginia, but become illegal at retail if they’re not on the state’s approved product directory. That structure puts enforcement squarely on the retailer, not the distributor or manufacturer.

Aziz says that divide is central to the confusion and frustration. “I’m buying from a warehouse in Virginia,” he said. “They sell it legally. But I get the ticket.” When he asked regulators for clarity, he was told, “You are direct to consumer. The warehouse is not.”

Rules have shifted rapidly, he said — delta-8 legal, then not; delta-10 legal, then not — and each change forced him to adjust inventory and suppliers. Inspections offered little certainty: regulators could inspect without citing problems, only for fines to arrive months later for items previously reviewed. Native Smoke was cited for selling a CBD product that contained no THC — not because of its contents, Aziz says, but over labeling and approval requirements he says were never clearly communicated. The initial penalty was $50,000; after escalation it was reduced to $1,000. “They told me it’s not their responsibility to keep us informed,” he said. “It’s our responsibility to know.”

That response, he says, highlights an imbalance: manufacturers and distributors often have legal teams and compliance staff and can move inventory across state lines. Retailers do not. “The enforcement always comes to the store,” Aziz said. “Not the manufacturer. Not the warehouse.” In practice, legal movement upstream can leave responsibility and risk concentrated at the retail level. “You’re the last stop,” he said. “So everything lands on you.”

“Most people just want to stay quiet”

Aziz is aware of a legal challenge to Virginia’s vape restrictions. A handful of distributors and retailers have sued, arguing the law functions as a de facto ban and unfairly advantages large manufacturers. But he doesn’t expect most shop owners to join that fight.

“That lawsuit is not coming from the average store,” he said. “It’s coming from people who can afford lawyers. That’s not most of us.” He estimates 90 to 95 percent of Virginia’s vape shops are immigrant-owned, many first-generation business owners. For them, the calculus is personal: thin margins, family on payroll, long-term leases. Disruption can ripple immediately. “People think if you’re legal, you shouldn’t be scared,” Aziz said. “That’s not how it works.”

Many owners fear drawing attention. “They don’t want to be on a list,” he said. “They don’t want inspections every week. They don’t want somebody asking extra questions.” Aziz is careful about invoking race — “I don’t want to say it’s racist,” he said — but he worries enforcement targets those who are most vulnerable. “They don’t go after the warehouse. They don’t go after the manufacturer. They come to the store.”

In the current political climate, reluctance to push back is stronger. “Right now, people don’t want problems with the government,” he said. “Any government.” Even owners with legal status hesitate. “Most of us came here to work, not to fight,” he said. “We followed the rules. We opened stores. We paid taxes. We did everything the right way.”

What happens when no one pushes back

Absent broad resistance, regulation becomes outcome. Markets consolidate.

On December 31, Virginia will remove the product diversity that sustains most independent vape shops. Once the Attorney General publishes the state’s approved product directory, retailers will have 60 days to sell through or remove inventory not on that list. After that, those products cannot legally be sold.

The law does not force stores to close, but by restricting legal sales to a narrow set of authorized products, it removes the economic foundation that makes staying open viable for many. By the time Virginia’s adult-use cannabis market opens in 2026, many small, immigrant-owned retailers that once served nicotine and hemp demand may already be gone — not by prohibition, but by attrition. That outcome will be described as regulation, but its effects may look a lot like monopoly.

Support RVA Magazine

RVA Magazine is one of Richmond’s independent voices, documenting local artists, musicians, and communities since 2005. Independent coverage requires resources; small donations, even $2, help keep that reporting alive and free from outside interference. If you value local journalism, consider supporting the magazine.

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *