Title: December 31, 2025 deadline could close hundreds of Virginia vape shops — and shift who profits from regulation

On December 31, most vape products currently sold in Virginia will be illegal to sell.

A law passed by the Virginia General Assembly and signed by Gov. Glenn Youngkin requires retailers to stock only nicotine and vape products listed on a state-maintained directory. In practice, that list will be limited to a small set of products tied to federal authorization, effectively banning the vast majority of flavored and disposable vapes from retail shelves across the state.

For shop owners like Tony Aziz, who runs Native Smoke in Richmond, the consequences are immediate and existential.

“If this goes into effect the way it’s written,” Aziz said, “I don’t know how we stay open.”

The fallout is not theoretical: broken leases, layoffs and the likely closure of hundreds of small businesses across Virginia. State records list more than 1,300 registered hemp and vape retailers statewide, and industry sources say the true number is likely higher because many nicotine-only or mixed retailers aren’t registered. Many of these stores sit in working-class corridors and strip centers already struggling to stay filled, raising questions about who will absorb the economic shock when enforcement hits overnight.

Who gets to stay on the shelf

The universe of vape products that will remain legal in Virginia is remarkably small. According to the FDA’s list of authorized e-cigarettes, nearly all approved products belong to major tobacco companies — including JUUL, Vuse, NJOY and Logic. Independent disposable brands and the flavored products that dominate most vape-shop shelves are almost entirely absent.

In July 2025, JUUL, owned by Richmond-based Altria, received FDA marketing authorization for its tobacco and menthol pods, allowing those products to remain available nationwide. That approval puts JUUL and its corporate partners in a privileged position just as Virginia prepares to eliminate most competing products from retail shelves.

The change won’t eliminate vaping; it will narrow who profits from it. Regulation, in this case, is consolidating the market.

A familiar framework

This pattern isn’t limited to nicotine. Virginia’s adult-use cannabis market, scheduled to begin in November 2026, is being built around limited licenses, high capital requirements and heavy compliance obligations — a framework that critics say favors well-capitalized corporate operators over small businesses and undercuts equity goals. (Read our Virginia Cannabis Marketplace framework coverage; photo by R. Anthony Harris.)

Enforcement against vape and hemp-derived products is also accelerating. For many vape shops, CBD and other hemp-derived cannabinoid products aren’t a side business — they’re essential to staying open. As those items are swept up in enforcement actions, independent retailers are being pushed out entirely.

The effect is sequential: vape and hemp retailers disappear first. By the time legal cannabis arrives, the network of small, decentralized cannabinoid storefronts may already be gone. What remains are businesses built to withstand regulatory narrowing — big tobacco companies with FDA-authorized products, multi-state cannabis operators able to absorb licensing costs, and corporate retail chains with statewide infrastructure and political power. The outcome looks less like prohibition and more like consolidation across adjacent markets.

“He did everything the right way”

Aziz’s stakes are shaped by a life built around hard work and little margin for failure. A refugee from Iraq, he spent years supporting family members stuck elsewhere in the region while carving out a life in the U.S. He slept in the subway in New York at one point and took whatever work he could find — washing dishes, delivering food — until he saved enough to move to Richmond, learn the business, and eventually open his own shop after nearly a decade working for someone else.

“I didn’t just wake up and open a business,” he said. “I worked for years. Everything I had went into this.” He put his name on a lease, built a household, put family on payroll — and now faces the prospect that those years of stability could vanish.

“This store is my life,” he said. “I worked too hard to get here to just walk away.”

Why enforcement lands at the counter

Under Virginia law, legality can change depending on where a product sits in the supply chain. Many vape and hemp-derived products are not illegal to manufacture, warehouse or distribute in Virginia; they become illegal only at the point of retail sale if they’re not listed on the state’s approved product directory. That distinction places enforcement squarely on the retailer, not the distributor or manufacturer.

Aziz says that divide drives confusion and frustration. “I’m buying from a warehouse in Virginia,” he said. “They sell it legally. But I get the ticket.” When he pressed regulators, he said the answer was blunt: “You are direct to consumer. The warehouse is not.”

The rules, he adds, change frequently, sometimes without clear notice. “Delta-8 was legal. Then it wasn’t. Delta-10 was legal. Then they took that too.” Each change forced him to adjust inventory and suppliers. Inspections offered little clarity, he said: regulators would inspect and raise no concerns, then months later fines would arrive for the same products.

One memorable citation involved a CBD product that contained no THC, Aziz said. The initial penalty was $50,000; after appeals it was reduced to $1,000. What stayed with him was the message he received: “It’s not their responsibility to keep us informed. It’s our responsibility to know.”

That experience, he says, exposes an imbalance: manufacturers and distributors operate with legal teams and compliance staff and can move inventory across states. Retailers cannot. “The enforcement always comes to the store,” Aziz said. “Not the manufacturer. Not the warehouse. You’re the last stop. So everything lands on you.”

“Most people just want to stay quiet”

Aziz is aware of a legal challenge to Virginia’s vape restrictions; a handful of distributors and retailers have sued, arguing the law is a de facto ban that advantages large manufacturers. But he doesn’t expect most shop owners to join that fight.

“That lawsuit is not coming from the average store,” he said. “It’s coming from people who can afford lawyers. That’s not most of us.”

Virginia’s retail vape industry is overwhelmingly immigrant-owned, Aziz estimates — 90 to 95 percent — many first-generation entrepreneurs. For them, the calculus is personal: thin margins, family on payroll, long-term leases. Any disruption has immediate ripple effects.

“People think if you’re legal, you shouldn’t be scared,” Aziz said. “That’s not how it works.” Fighting the state feels risky: “They don’t want to be on a list. They don’t want inspections every week. They don’t want somebody asking extra questions.”

He is cautious discussing race. “I don’t want to say it’s racist,” he said. “But sometimes it feels like they know who to go after.” His concern is structural: enforcement targets the storefront, not upstream actors. In the current climate, he said, many simply don’t want problems with the government. “Most of us came here to work, not to fight,” he said. “We followed the rules. We opened stores. We paid taxes. We did everything the right way.”

What happens when no one pushes back

When resistance is limited, regulation becomes the outcome. On December 31, Virginia will remove the product diversity that sustains most independent vape shops. Once the Attorney General publishes the state’s approved product directory, retailers will have 60 days to sell through or remove any inventory not on that list. After that window, those products cannot legally be sold.

For many shops, that inventory is their core business. The law doesn’t mandate closures, but by restricting legal sales to a narrow set of authorized products it can remove the economic foundation that makes staying open viable. By the time legal cannabis arrives in 2026, many small, immigrant-owned retailers that once served nicotine and hemp demand may already be gone — not by outright ban, but by attrition. The outcome will be described as regulation, but its effects may resemble monopoly.

Support independent local coverage

At a time when media ownership is increasingly concentrated, RVA Magazine remains one of Richmond’s independent voices, covering artists, musicians and communities since 2005. If you value local, grassroots reporting free from outside interference, consider supporting RVA Magazine with a small donation — even $2 helps. Your contribution keeps independent coverage alive.